Tracking The Cognitive Spectrum of Arabic Learning Textbook Based on Curriculum Integration: HOTS, MOTS or LOTS? / Melacak Spektrum Unsur Kognitif Pada Buku Teks Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab Berbasis Integrasi Kurikulum: HOTS, MOTS atau LOTS?
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the leveling of textbook based on Bloom's Taxonomy theory which includes the categories of high-order thinking skills (HOTS), medium-order thinking skills (MOTS), and low-order thinking skills (LOTS). This study used a qualitative approach with a case study method. Data were collected through interviews, observations, and documentation; then analyzed using the Miles & Huberman method and content analysis. The results of this study indicate that the Ministry of Religious Affairs textbook for grade XII shows the LOTS category which is characterized by a more dominant percentage of exercises including category C2. This is indicated by the percentage of exercises as much as 18% in category C1 (knowing), 30% in category C2 (Understanding), 22% in category C3 (applying), 3% in category C4 (analyzing) and 0% in category C5 (evaluating) and 27% in category C6 (creating). Meanwhile, 4 textbooks in the Diniyyah Arabic Center curriculum are still classified as LOTS (Lower Order Thinking Skills) which is characterized by the distribution of operational verbs in the four books belonging to the memorizing and mentioning categories, not yet reaching the creating level. The DAC teaching materials show a 52% MOTS level, while C1 remains at 4%. C2 has a 30% percentage, and C4 shows 14%. Based on this, the DAC textbook remains at the Middle Order Thinking Skills level. This study also compares two curricula (KMA and DAC) simultaneously.
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penjenjangan buku teks pelajaran berdasarkan teori Taksonomi Bloom yang meliputi kategori keterampilan berpikir tingkat tinggi (HOTS), keterampilan berpikir tingkat sedang (MOTS), dan keterampilan berpikir tingkat rendah (LOTS). Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode studi kasus. Data dikumpulkan melalui wawancara, observasi, dan dokumentasi; kemudian dianalisis menggunakan metode Miles & Huberman dan analisis isi. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa buku teks pelajaran Kementerian Agama untuk kelas XII menunjukkan kategori LOTS yang ditandai dengan persentase latihan yang lebih dominan termasuk kategori C2. Hal ini ditunjukkan dengan persentase latihan sebanyak 18% pada kategori C1 (mengetahui), 30% pada kategori C2 (Memahami), 22% pada kategori C3 (menerapkan), 3% pada kategori C4 (menganalisis) dan 0% pada kategori C5 (mengevaluasi) dan 27% pada kategori C6 (mencipta). Sementara itu, 4 buku teks dalam kurikulum Diniyyah Arabic Center masih tergolong LOTS (Lower Order Thinking Skills) yang ditandai dengan distribusi kata kerja operasional pada keempat buku yang termasuk dalam kategori menghafal dan menyebutkan, belum mencapai tingkat mencipta. Bahan ajar DAC menunjukkan tingkat MOTS sebesar 52%, sementara C1 tetap 4%. C2 memiliki persentase 30%, dan C4 menunjukkan 14%. Berdasarkan hal ini, buku teks DAC masih berada pada tingkat Middle Order Thinking Skills. Penelitian ini juga membandingkan dua kurikulum (KMA dan DAC) secara bersamaan.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Al-Qatawneh, Sami Sulieman et al. “The representation of multiple intelligences in an intermediate Arabic-language textbook, and teachers’ awareness of them in Jordanian schools.” Heliyon 7.5 (2021): 1. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07004.
Aman, M Rizki Hi, Sugirma, and Zulaeha. “Innovation in Maharah Kitabah Assessment with Bloom’s Taxonomy Approach in Arabic Language Learning Books for Class X Published by the Ministry of Religion in 2020.” Loghat Arabi 5.2 (2024): 273.
Anjani, Novika Dwi, Hikmah, and Masrun. “Penerapan HOTS dalam Soal Buku Bahasa Arab di MTS Miftahul Hidayah.” Pediaqu: Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial dan Humaniora 3.2 (2024): 1445–1455.
Barari, Nori et al. “Designing and validating educational standards for E-teaching in virtual learning environments (VLEs), based on revised Bloom’s taxonomy.” Interactive Learning Environments 30.9 (2022): 1640–1652.
Crompton, Helen, Diane Burke, and Yi Ching Lin. “Mobile learning and student cognition: A systematic review of PK-12 research using Bloom’s Taxonomy.” British Journal of Educational Technology 50.2 (2019): 684–701.
Eldara, Dian Soraya, and R Umi Baroroh. “Inovasi Instrumen Penilaian Mahârah al-Kitâbah Berbasis HOTS pada Buku Teks Bahasa Arab.” ARABI 10.1 (2025): 110–120.
Febrianti, Sang Ayu Diah, I Wayan Widiana, and Kadek Yudi Ana. “Higher-Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) Instrument-Based Cognitive Evaluation in Grade V Elementary School Students.” Thinking Skills and Creativity Journal 4.2 (2021): 48.
Fidayani, Eka Fitria, and Farikh Marzuki Ammar. “The Use of Azhari Curriculum in Arabic Language Learning at Islamic Boarding School.” Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam 6.1 (2023): 25–45.
Hamid, M Abdul, Danial Hilmi, and Syaiful Mustofa. “Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Berbasis Teori Belajar Kontruktivisme Untuk Mahasiswa.” Journal Imla 4.1 (2019): 100–114.
Hasan Syaiful Rizal, and Ulfatul Chasanah. “Analisis Konten Buku Ajar Bahasa Arab MTs Kelas VII Kurikulum KMA No. 183 2019.” Jurnal Mu’allim 5.1 (2023): 132–146.
Husna, Ilya et al. “The Analysis of Arabic Language Textbook for Class II Elementary School.” Lectura 13.2 (2022): 234–245.
Ikrima, Ikrima, Asep Sunarko, and Luluk Alawiyah. “Analisis Perbandingan Kualitas Buku Teks Bahasa Arab Kelas VI Terbitan Kemenag dan Erlangga.” Edu Journal Innovation in Learning and Education 2.1 (2024): 40–51.
Kafi, Fina Aunul, and Zidni Ilma. “Analisis Soal Tematik Bahasa Arab berbasis HOTS pada Kelas XII MAN 3 Jember.” Al-Fusha : Arabic Language Education Journal 4.1 (2022): 1–9. Available: http://ejournal.inaifas.ac.id/index.php/alfusha/article/view/729.
Kanwal, Shazia. “Preferences of the Teachers in Employing Revised Blooms Taxonomy in their Instructions” 3.2 (2020): 258–266.
Mahmudi, Arifka. “Challenges facing Arabic language teachers in applying higher-order thinking skills in teaching speaking skills in public secondary schools in Malang.” UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, 2020. Available: http://etheses.uin-malang.ac.id/15846/.
Maisaroh, Siti, Moh Badruddin Amin, and Khomisatul Fajriyah. “Bahan Ajar Keterampilan Menulis Berbasis Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) di PBA IAIN Madura.” Fondatia Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar 9.2 (2022): 155–165.
Mufti, Ali, and Mudrofin Mudrofin. “Analisis Kesesuaian Kompetensi Dasar dengan Bahan Ajar Bahasa Arab MTs Kelas IX Karya Yushi M. Mahmudah.” Alsina : Journal of Arabic Studies 3.1 (2022): 81–102.
Nira, R D, and Y Fauziyah. “Development of Arabic Curriculum in Improving Pedagogic Competence of Lecturer Ma’had Umar Bin Al-Khattab.” Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam 4.2 (2021): 294–309. Available: https://e-journal.ikhac.ac.id/index.php/NAZHRUNA/article/view/1480.
Rahmawati, Suci Ramadhanti Febriani, and Shofia Nailatul Haq. “Increasing the Pedagogical Competency of Arabic Teachers Through HOTS-Based Modules.” Loghat Arabi: Jurnal Bahasa Arab dan Pendidikan Bahasa Arab 4.2 (2023): 282. Available: https://journal.iaiddipolman.ac.id/index.php/loghat/index.
Reznani, Nur Shabrina, Nurhayati Nurhayati, and Sungkowo Soetopo. “Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Mata Kuliah Menyimak Berbasis Kearifan Lokal.” Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra 21.1 (2021): 79–94.
Rifai, Muhammad et al. “Analisis Modul Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab Madrasah Aliyah Kelas XII DIY Tahun 2023.” Ihtimam: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab 08 (2025): 140–151.
Swart, Arthur James, and Marllene Daneti. “Analyzing Learning Outcomes for Electronic Fundamentals Using Bloom’s Taxonomy.” In IEEE Global Enginering Education Conference (EDUCON). 39–44, 2019.
Wijayanti, Rica, Buaddin Hasan, and Rishi Kumar Loganathan. “Media comic math berbasis whiteboard annimation dalam pelajaran matematika.” Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika 5.1 (2018): 53.
Yolanda, Refiyana et al. “Analisis Bahan Ajar ‘ Hayya Nata’allam al-Arabiyah’ Kelas XII SMA/SMK Perspektif Teori Abdullah Al-Gali dan Abdul Hamid Abdullah.” Loghat Arabi: Jurnal Bahasa Arab dan Pendidikan Bahasa Arab 5.2 (2024): 257–272. Available: https://journal.iaiddipolman.ac.id/index.php/loghat/index.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36915/la.v6i2.565
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Suci Ramadhanti Febriani, Shintia Aqilah Ramadhani

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
INDEXED AND ABSTRACTED BY:
Editorial Office:
Loghat Arabi: Jurnal Bahasa Arab dan Pendidikan Bahasa Arab, E-ISSN:2722-1180 | E-ISSN:2722-1199
Arabic Education Department, Faculty of Education and Teachers Training, Institut Agama Islam DDI Polewali Mandar, Sulawesi Barat. e-mail: loghatarabi.pbajournal@ddipolman.ac.id.
Jl. Gatot Soebroto No. 61 Kel. Madatte Polewali Kab. Polewali Mandar, Sulawesi Barat 91311, Indonesia
Loghat Arabi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
.png)
.png)
.png)


_(1).png)
.png)
.png)
_(2)_(1).png)
_(1).png)
2.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
